Talk:Linedef type 422

Wait, is the no-climb flag expressed as NOCLIMB or just 64? If it isn't expressed as NOCLIMB, manually change my edits; don't revert them; there may be another thing I fixed in one of those articles. –SonicMaster 10:58, 2 November 2007 (PDT)

64 is a flags value for linedefs. That specific value is named NOCLIMB. Calling it NOCLIMB is more appropriate. ~DarkWarrior ^{Talk • Contribs} 11:12, 2 November 2007 (PDT)

Better yet, call it what SRB2DB's flags checklist calls it: "No Climb". Quotes, no <code>, as it's really just an alias. In my view, all references to flags should be made in that manner, as SRB2DB calls them. --Digiku ^talk 11:19, 2 November 2007 (PDT)

Here we go: Linedef#Flags - Use the names supplied in this table, and link to this page like so: "No Climb". Don't use numbers in the article. --Digiku ^talk 11:33, 2 November 2007 (PDT)

That's what I meant. Does it use code tags or not? My question came out totally wrong. And now you've answered. –SonicMaster 14:50, 2 November 2007 (PDT)

This would explain how Sonicmaster did those camera bits in his levels.--Glaber 03:33, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Linedef name consistency

"That just unnecessarily makes the name longer" - SpiritCrusher

Then we need to tell Neo (or someone else) to change the SRB2DBCFG as well. I'd recommend to keep a synchronization between the wiki and the CFG. --Ezer'Arch|עֶזֶר'Aρχ^Talk 19:12, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

I am not exactly an advocate of keeping full consistency between both. For example, if we went by the config, the "Eggman Monitor" would be called "Eggman". I personally go by what makes most sense, and adding a "Switch To" is just unnecessary. --SpiritCrusher^{Talk • Contribs} 19:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC)